This ties onto the end of another dream where they were working on the roads outside the Berrimah Police station and I was in a car that drove up ramps to park on the back of a truck, specifically to piss off the driver of the truck. Someone I knew in Perth nicknamed Ranga
It lead into a dream about being a member of British Intelligence that I detailed in the previous post
I am standing in the middle of the empty shed where the truck had been moments earlier with the car on the back
I don't know where it went
There was a massive clump of earth in the middle of filled with metal and mineral deposits
Suddenly gravity gives way and I'm standing sideways in the air with my feet on that large clump of earth
I'm literally walking sideways on the walls, but centred on the earth on the middle of the room
I have a amazing realisation that what I'm standing on is the core of the planet
I'm literally standing on the centre of the world 😊
Some other things happen here that I won't detail
But then ...
I'm flashing between different people, in different bodies and at different times. But doing it in such a way that I can see the shift
I'm watching it happen as both the person(s) it's happening to, but also also as myself watching it
A voice over the top explains how I see, what I see and why it happens
From what they tell me ...
Mostly I see pain
Sometimes I see pleasure
Sometimes I see 'my death as other people' (very particular choice of words in explaining what I see)
Then as a example of what I see, how and why ...
I am put into the body of a someone who was killed by a group of women
It ties into the British Intelligence post, but it very intentionally non-linear, to give impression and understanding of multiple events and people linking in at once
I saw a woman kill the three women that killed her, before she resurrected, not a man. Not the man who works for British Intelligence who took over (as me, taking her over) after the woman was killed, to kill those women in return
But they both happened. And neither happened. If that makes sense
If I had to guess:
He never did this
He also never killed those women
And that original woman never actually died
She would have died, if things hadn't been made as they were, by understanding of everything that would happen/was to happen
I didn't take over her resurrected body to avenge her after they had killed her. It happened in prophetic retrospective
Meaning, because they were going to kill her, I took over, in sync to her, to kill them for her
Because I knew she would not fight back and she would let them kill her, by her gentle and submissive nature
So I made sure it didn't happen
She killed them herself in self-defense
But she was not aware that anything helped her. In her mind it felt like she acted on some sort of survival instinct and defense mechanism, more than it felt like anything took over and guided her, which is what really happened
A "I don't know what came over me" type of situation
So that the possible outcomes became the outcome with the least death. And the right people who needed to die, where the ones who died
I think the link of this to the member of British Intelligence was a form Introspective insurance for the future to manage the outcome of the situation
Using the highest levels of Government to ensure that the woman would be OK, after the incident took place
She would not end up in jail for doing it
To influence the outcome of future events to ensure they were the desired (right) outcome
There are at least 6 degrees of physical separation (bodies) with in the dream, involved in influencing the events
7 if you include the astral version of myself within the dream, over/outside my physical self
8 if you include the other intelligence/consciousness/entity (I'm not sure exactly whether it is intelligent, or intelligently designed) who explained the connections and allowed me to see them
I'm assuming that because they are oversee'er, they would need to be consciously intelligent, by necessity of their position within the design
Because the only other explanation would be that they are subject to me in this world (Which would YOU prefer to be the real?)
I also understand that what I saw with the British Intelligence officer was a encoded output of something equally real, to saving the woman prior to the event taking place
Whether it is future or past is irrelevant in this circumstance, because it holds little importance to what is being done
Their importance is being used. But they are not important. If that makes sense
What I saw happening with them is interesting, because it literally integrates what is being written, into what takes place
So that part of what is written never happens
But part of what is written also most certainly happens
Whether or not any of it is true, is not important
Because parts of it are most certainly true and that is what is truly important
Through the veil and a million possibilities and probabilities ...
What could be truth or lies, if any of it mattered ...
Are perfect truths which can be seen
Important things ...
Such as names and crimes
Wrong shines through, because of the absence of right. If that makes sense
So if I had to guess? Claire is a real person. 'Tower of London' is a real code/nickname
And they are doing some sort of wrong, for which they should/need to be made accountable (ARE being, are to be)
The rest is weave of the fabric of the veil, integrating anyone in/to this world, into/unto anothers ability to see them, integrate with them, or use them if necessary
'The works' more likely link to probability and possibility in what is being shown, to be these very writings, being read from the perspective of those who may or may not be reading them. May of may not have a reason to read them. And may or may not care about the contents IF any of the other conditional integration was/is so
Basically? The works were what could/would actually be considered their work, but actually related to and referred to my written works, if it were ever the case that they were to be reading them
Whether or not they do, is irrelevant. They are irrelevant
Not because of my perception of them, but because of my lack of ability to do so. If that makes sense
It means that if anyone are ever to lurk in the dark, reading this, thinking they could not be seen, or wanting to remain unseen, they would literally become irrelevant in the grand scheme of things by their own wish
It's beautiful and poetic when you think about
It works better than this though, because it does not/would not give them the (em)power(ment) they think it does. It would actually do the opposite and open them to equal inspection for their own personal crimes
They would be put under a intangible lens in much the same way that they could/would to another
If ever it were to be the case that this/that were/is happening
And if they were to? The very words they would use would be "It reads like a God damn James Bond film"
Meaning (that) it most likely never happened and was never said ...
And most likely never will be said now, because of this very post
But 'If' it ever/had ever/has happened. They would be the words used
To link them to their own actions
Past, present, or some time into the future
It does not matter, because all time exists in the same moment and instance of time and space concurrently
It's all relative to your ability to harmonise with it, or your attempt to try control it
Swim against the strong current of a river to get to shore, you likely drown
Or drift with the current downstream and use it easily grace yourself with the shore
Or ...
Become the water ...
And neautrally observe all those who get wet
I love complex non-linear dynamics 💞💛💞
No comments:
Post a Comment