Friday, 7 October 2022
BRAD PITT - TIME TRAVEL MOVIE
Thursday, 6 October 2022
A FAKE NADIA COMANECI CHOKING ME
SENTIENCE - MOVIE
Tuesday, 27 September 2022
PLANE CRASHES WHILE LANDING
Wednesday, 14 September 2022
LINE OF ASCENSION vs LINE OF SUCCESSION
This is an amalgamation of things I have learned and been told through various visions, dreams and other such types of encounters, regarding the legitimacy of the throne and how it is seeded and seated
Firstly and most importantly, Queen Elizabeth II was illegitimate
It was impossible for her to be a legitimate Queen, only ever a caretaker to the throne, which belongs to someone else
The simple reason for this, is that he is a female, who did not obtain the throne through marriage
This is where the difference between ascension and succession comes into play
The true "Royal" lineages of this world are based on particular named bloodlines, which date back farther than any other known bloodlines
Ascension works through the naming of these bloodlines, as they are passed down from Father to Son
The reason for this, is that the male line, carries direct lineage, similar to the tap-root on a tree
The male is the seed
The female is the field
The seed of the tree remains the same. It is only the field in which it is planted, which gives variants of the type of tree
The idea, is that the seed, son, looks for new and fertile fields in which to spread the seed, for the next generation of the tree
To this end, the original royal bloodlines did not work in the way they are often historically portrayed
We are told that the Son "Prince", would ideally look for a woman of similar royal status, or from noble bloodlines, in which to sew his seed
An almost incestuous type of inner circle, that would solidify political alliances and power
Originally, this was never the case. Only in recent history with the advent of succession replacing ascension, has this become the case
The true ancient royal bloodlines, would intentionally look for woman outside of known bloodlines. And marriage into other royal bloodlines, was never done
The idea, was for the son to find fresh, new and fertile fields, by taking a wife as far removed from the surrounding genetic pool as possible
This would not only assure healthy and pure offspring, but it would also help to expand the Kingdom geographically. Whilst assuring that the strongest variant of the tree could be created, in the most fertile fields available
The problem for many who aspired to be royalty, was that the only possible way to become so, was to carry the name of the genetic bloodline
This meant, that the only real possible way for your family to go from nobility, to royalty, was to have one of your daughters marry the King, as his field, and create the next generation of offspring
This was less than ideal for those who aspired to power, for a few reasons
Firstly, for the male aspiring, the bloodline was not theirs. Something which is very important to consider, when understanding why it is impossible for Queen Elizabeth II to have been a legitimate heir to the throne
Though your daughter may marry the son of the King, and eventually become Queen herself, when the son takes over the throne, she can only ever be a genetic variant for the seed of another bloodline
Though the children will carry parts of her Fathers genetics, they will not be of his direct bloodline ascendance
The children are bloodline of the King
Sons will be direct bloodline of the King. Not the Father of the Queen
Daughters will be once removed of both King and Queen. Something entirely new. Created for the genetic purposes of keeping the gene pool fresh
Neither are a direct descendant of the Queens Fathers bloodline, thought they carry parts of his genetic make-up
The only true direct descendants, are the male sons, born to the male father
Direct lineage is carried son to son
So, although it is favourable to have your daughter bare the children of the King, it is not ideal
It does not carry your direct bloodline
Even if your daughter becomes the Queen, your "direct" bloodline of sons and their sons, will move farther and farther away from the royal line with each generation
Second problem for nobility? Was that the sons of the King were encouraged to go out and find a woman (often of common birth) in far off lands and kingdoms, to take as his wife, to eventually become Queen
This presented a very big problem for those seeking power, in even having the sons of the King marry one of their daughters
As such was seemed as undesirable to the lineage
Things were done this way for very good and specific reason
It avoided all the problems that are inherent with the adopted processes of succession we see today, and backwards misconceptions and misunderstandings about how "royal" process works
Almost everything that is done today, is backwards, or a complete corruption of what the processes are supposed to be
So what happened to the line of ascension? And how did these problems come about?
It started with the named bloodline of ascension, being abandoned in favour of "House" names
When a bloodline name can only be carried between Father and legitimate son, it made things very difficult for those aspiring to take the throne, to be regarded as legitimate themselves
The only way males could carry the legitimate heir name, was to be born into the family
If they did not carry the name of the direct linage, then it was instantly known, that they were in no way legitimate, or able to sit on the throne
So "House" names were adopted instead
They did away with named bloodlines, so that nobody would be able to tell if you were legitimate by birth or not
They would only know that you were a named member of a particular house. Meaning that it was possible you carried some type of legitimacy by association
This way, any bloodline could take a "name" that was deemed necessary for the throne
And this way, you could make an illegitimate bloodline, the heir to a throne which was not theirs
A throne, that in the old ways, would have been impossible for them to take
As it stands today ... All named "Houses" are illegitimate
Any who belong to a "House" without a named bloodline, did so, in order to illegitimately take a throne
The fact they have no named bloodline, which was done in order to take a throne which was not theirs, is literally the very piece of evidence which proves that the throne is not theirs. And they are illegitimate
The original true heirs to the throne and the named bloodlines still exist to this day
A named bloodline, which is a chain unbroken, since the dawn of man
They are very aware of who these bloodlines are, because of their family name
Kohn, Korn, Kohen and many other variants exist today
Variants of what is known as "Kohen/Christ" in the Bible. Which was known as "Khonsu/Khons" in Egyptian times
A name which means "Conscious"
There is only one variant of this name in particular that carries the true original, unbroken line of ascension though
Yet somehow, we are about to crown a false King in England, who is not of bloodline even close to any of these variants
He is not even of a named bloodline. He belongs to a house
Someone who is claims his succession from his Mothers bloodline. Even though this is impossible, as he carries his Fathers bloodline
A Father who was never named King. Because they understood the implications of this, to the false bloodline who already sat upon the throne
The simple fact, is that you cannot pass a throne down from a Father to a Daughter
It does not matter how people "think" it works. Or how they would like it to work. It simply cannot be done
What happens when you do this, is that the throne becomes the bloodline of the man the Kings daughter marries. Not his
It is no longer the bloodline of the King. It is bloodline of the man his daughter married
So the thone has been handed to a completely different linage
A lineage which is likely less royal, than the already non-royal line that it succeeded from
So to pass the throne from Elizabeth II to Charles, means the throne no longer carries her original lineage. It carries Philips
True lineage can only ever be carried from Father to Son
If the King does not have a son, then the lineage needs regress across generations, until it finds the continued direct descendant
The King has no sons, you go back to the Kings next oldest brother and to his oldest son
Always to the son. Never to the Kings brother
The original ascendance was never carried out laterally
Meaning, that if an heir was needed to a King which had no son, it would never (and could NEVER) be carried to his brother. Only to his brothers sons
This was done to prevent a whole myriad of problems
If the King had no brother, with sons to appoint heirs?
They would look back to the prior generation
They would go back to the Kings Fathers, brother. To the oldest of-age son, or his oldest son (by matching generation)
They would, where necessary, go back as many generations as was needed, to find the truest living male heir, which carried the correct bloodline and name
Line of Ascension cannot be disputed
Line of Succession can
Line of Ascension is legitimate
Line of Succession is not
It is not merely about the named bloodline and family who should be the kings of this world. It is about what the purity of their particular genetics carry
They carry more than just a name and bloodline
They carry abilities and understanding, that are lessened within subsequent genetic lines, the further the branches move away from the trunk of the tree and its roots
These named bloodlines are the rightful heirs because they have the genetically ingrained understanding and abilities to lead this world and connect to it in ways which cannot be faked or imitated
Things which others cannot do. No matter their house, influence, money or resources
But the biggest problem with the line of succession, is that it kills the tree of this world
The further they move into the corrupt lines, and further they continue with the lies and false blood, the darker this world gets
The less we know. The worse the world gets
It is not something which can be faked
They push their own fake house, they limit and kill the true bloodline
To the point where less and less new lines of that bloodline are created
The bloodline regresses backwards, until it is dead completely
And when that happens. This world is dead
It does not matter that they name the "Anti-conscious" (Anti-Christ) by a first name "Charles" which is supposed to mirror the true bloodline (Charles is a "Conscious" variant, similar to "Kohen, Kohn, Korn, Christ, etc) ...
He cannot be, what he is not
He is the literal opposite of the conscious bloodlines that give this world life
If such a thing as the antichrist were to exist in this world? It would be "Prince" Charles, if he is silly enough to take a throne, which he knows does not belong to him
FLOODS AND A VERY GREEK "PRINCE" CHARLES
I am talking to an older Greek man. A man who I believe is supposed to be Prince Charles. I wondered why he looked very inherently Greek compared to Prince Charles, till I realise that Charles father was supposed to be Greek
We are talking about massive floods which hit Darwin
I ask him if he were affected at his house. "House?" he said, making a point of emphasising very specific meaning in my choice of words
He confirms that yes, the flood affected him "over in Alawa"
I tell him that the flood was so big, that in places, you would have been able to ride the surge like waves with a surfboard
If it were not far too dangerous to do so
Then we are sitting on a shaded ridge line, overlooking massive stone buildings. Buildings arranged in such a way that you we are looking between two massive buildings facing each other, over the top of some smaller building, at a massive centre-piece type building in the background, facing us, tying the others on either side together
The buildings are so massive, that there is football fields inbetween them, with people scurrying across the grass between buildings, like little ants
The building in the background is on a scale similar to the Taj Mahal. Probably bigger, because it is longer across the breadth
The middle of the centre-piece building, is a massive tower. Like a clock tower, holding the middle spire up above the rest of the buildings in scope and scale
The fields and surrounding gardens are beautifully tended to
To be sitting on the ridge line looking at this is awe inspiring
The buildings in size, easily dwarf the layout and buildings of similar structure in Washington
And the stonework, is the type that has not been seen in this world for a very long time. There is literally nothing like it in the world, being build of solid stone, in the world today. There has not been anything like this, probably in recent history. Anywhere
Charles finally notices what we are looking at, and verbally "Wow" in wonder at what he is seeing
In this moment. I realise a connection between him and myself within the real waking world
His is a real conscious entity, somewhere in this world. The same as I
And somehow, we are sharing this view here. Now
I am, for a moment, shocked, that a real living person in this world, is sharing one of these vivid, real life, colour visions, which I have often
It is normally only myself having these types of visions
But for this one. For some reason. He is present
I feel a momentary sense of something that almost feels like pride. A feeling almost like happiness, at someone experiencing something in your world and finding it beautiful
I go to step down off the ledge of the ridge to the ground. It looks like it is only a short drop, but it is actually a massive way down. A fall you would not survive
I warn Charles. Telling him that it looks small, but it is actually much, much bigger than he thinks
Something I think was done intentionally, to emphasise the scope of the stone buildings and surrounding grounds that we are looking at
They may look small, but they are massive on a global scale. Dwarfing most old stone buildings of a similar size, across the entire planet
There is an entity present, acting as a guide, as there often is when I have vivid waking dreams and visions such as this
Someone who puts things into context, or often, details things very blatantly
"What you are looking at, will be built in Darwin, in around 60 years from now. Outside of Palmerston"
I try to guess what it is. Thinking that it is likely one of the premium centres for learning in the world
Guessing that it is a University, I call it "A.I.N"
I wake up, trying to guess what this means
Possibly, it meant something to "Prince" Charles, if indeed it were him, sharing the vision
Thursday, 14 July 2022
NEUROPEPTIDE DEVICE TO TRIGGER EGG PRODUCTION AND OVULATION IN WOMEN
Tuesday, 12 July 2022
CONNECTION TO OTHER WORLDLY ENTITY
Thursday, 19 May 2022
TOUR OF ARTIFICIAL ATMOSPHERE DOMES
Saturday, 9 April 2022
Gal Gadot And Henry Cavill Helping Fans
Sunday, 3 April 2022
Talking With Bradie Again - About Spirits And Non-Human Entities
Saturday, 2 April 2022
Using The Serpent To Link To Bradie Mercer
Monday, 28 March 2022
Clint Eastwood Injured Whilst Acting
Friday, 25 March 2022
Multi-Dimensional Perception And Phantom Pains
Can I be Honest With You? I'm Not Your Friend
Sunday, 13 March 2022
RUSSIA AND AMERICA, AND LASER EYES
Sunday, 27 February 2022
KILLING THE LEFT PART OF THE TRINITY
Thursday, 17 February 2022
TV Series - Reverse Of "Raised By Wolves"
Sunday, 13 February 2022
Azazel is Jesus
Something regularly comes to me while I
am sleeping, which “teaches” me things
I wake up after
these encounters, feeling as if I have just come from a classroom,
recounting in writing if needed, what I have been told or shown, so that I remember it
I
was shown and told something interesting this morning, so I thought I
would share it
The teacher seemed to be demonstrating the
manifestation and attachment of paradimensional entities
There
seemed to be main types of manifested being
They gave
me a demonstration on the more modern version of the two
entities first
They showed me a physically manifested example of the
entity and demonstrated how it was able to be dissolved within the
mind, so that it disappeared
Afterwards, they showed how such
a manifestation was not actually destroyed, it simply disappeared.
With one call, the entity reappeared, through fire and light. Returning
as if it were never actually gone
It seemed to simply do the
will of those it was manifested upon/with/in/through/to/from
If
they wanted it there, it existed within the positive balance of
lights influence within this world
If they didn't want it
there, it faded into the negative balance of lights influence within
this world
By the looks of it, it seemed to be tied in to some
sort of nuclear expression, which is why it passed through fire. It
looked as though it existed within the positive/negative influence of
the sun itself
It was created as a type of “counter”, or
duality, to the conscious mind/consciousness, of the person it was
created upon (and attached to)
Once it was there, it would
always be there. But you could send it dormant, if you so
wished
Though it seemed to be a being completely born of
light, which could pass through the fire of the sun itself, it also
seemed passive
In fact it was referred to as the passive one
of the two. The entity which reflected the persons own ideal in
balance, and maybe perfection
Love, where love was needed. A
stern voice, where one needed to be heard
It seemed to be some
type of extension of the conscience, in realisation, through the
world. An entity which could be seen as a companion, or a curse,
depending on how it was received
An entity which would take
any name, or characterisation the individual would like to give
it
As it existed on the border of light, and was manifested
upon/with/in/through/to/from the person, it could be heard by the
person
A “voice in their head”, that would be/could be,
whatever they needed. As perfect, pure and good as they needed, or as
chaotic, corrupt and seemingly evil as the needed. Depending on what
the case would be
It seemed to be what many would/could
manifest as demon, or Angel. As the voice of God, or Jesus Christ
itself, if they so wished it to be
It was and is, essentially
everything and anyone, within its manifestation. And is literally
born of the Sun itself. So, for it to allow someone to think of it as
Jesus Christ, or anyone else, is not technically a lie
“It
will be who it need be, as it need be. When it need be. If it need be”
It is the one who
lives within the light. Therefore, it is a manifestation of God.
Regardless of how such a concept it interpreted. It lives within the
ability to interpret such things, and therefore it is not subject to
them. It is them. At least, within their realisation and
actualisation
The second entity which was shown to me, was
much older
And more than just being a manifested entity, this
entity also seemed to be a physical being in some regard. Somewhere other than here
I am
not sure of what this being is, in relation to the other type of
entity
But it seemed to be being shown to me, in order to give
a distinction between the two types of manifestations
Both of which, are native, in their connection, to my own conscious, conscious mind, and consciousness (trinity)
Firstly
and most importantly, there seemed to be no contention between the
two
They were not diametrically opposed in any way that I
could tell. None was considered more “divine” than the other, or
more important. In fact, they seemed to both be instruments of the
same creation, in the sense that they would likely consider each
other to be friend. Without any sense of superiority or inferiority
between the two
Having said this … It would seem to me that,
if it came down to it, this second type of entity would have the
final say in any disagreement which could arise between the
two
Mainly because of the fact it appeared to have a
physically manifested side to it
I was told that “Its name
is Azazel”
I was then told, that the very first time the
world “God” was conceived and used in this world, this entity is
what they were referring to
Long before the other
entity
Another who was there with me, tested what they were
being told, by calling upon the name of Jesus Christ against what
they were being told
The entity teaching as kindly responded
that “Azazel is Jesus. They are the same thing”
They are
the same thing
He spelled out the syllables:
Je-su-s ==
A-zaz-el
The other conscious mind that was there with me being
taught, asked how it compares to other entity in how it exists
“If
the other entity exists within nuclear expression, such a light and
sound; then where and how does this one exist”
The only
answer it gave, was that “If there was nuclear destruction, this
entity would survive”
It seemed to be saying, that even if
the sun and the universe itself ceased to shine, so that light,
sound, time and space ceased to exist; this entity would still exist
Sunday, 6 February 2022
Creator Of Enki - And All That We Know
I am on another person. We are acting
as one conscious mind as if I am them (and they are me), but at the
same time I know (and am aware that) I am only observing them
My
conscious syncs like this often. Viewing both myself and someone
else, externally, internally, and inbetween, all at the same
time
They have the manifested appearance of a Vampire. Not
just any Vampire though. A type of leader, or King amongst
Vampires
I understand within my own conscious, that this is
just a contextual manifestation
I am seeing a leader amongst
Vampires, but it actually represents some type of Church leader, like
the Pope, or someone similar
They (with me aboard, with our
conscious synced) are awakened by something they cannot see
They
are confused at being “awake”, in comparison to the state they
were just in
They test their physical abilities, in the sense
of trying to understand what, if anything, was done to
them
Something similar to being drugged, they expect to be
somehow inhibited or effected by whatever was done to them
They
are surprised to find that whatever was done to them, means that
their physical abilities and power now far exceeds anything they
had/have ever known before/in the past
A simple jump in the
air, sends them 20 metres into the sky
They are confused about
how what is happening is possible
The world around them
shrinks and disappears
They are drawn into another realm, to
stand before a very serious looking man in a business suit, with no
tie
He is standing in the foyer of a very expensive and
futuristic looking building, against a smooth steel railing
He
introduces himself to the man, as I watch on, now slightly removed
from being synced with his conscious, as to be able to watch
externally
“I am the creator of Enki”
The Vampire
Priest/Pope seems to realise what is happening is very serious
The
man introduces himself adds, for clarification and clarity: “Which
means I also created everything you know”
This statement
gave a definitive understanding to myself, and to the Vampire
Priest/Pope that he was speaking to, that he was introducing himself
as “Gods” creator
Something tells me that the Pope, or
perhaps many people like, or including, the Pope, are having
experiences similar to this now. Or will be soon