This is an amalgamation of things I have learned and been told through various visions, dreams and other such types of encounters, regarding the legitimacy of the throne and how it is seeded and seated
Firstly and most importantly, Queen Elizabeth II was illegitimate
It was impossible for her to be a legitimate Queen, only ever a caretaker to the throne, which belongs to someone else
The simple reason for this, is that he is a female, who did not obtain the throne through marriage
This is where the difference between ascension and succession comes into play
The true "Royal" lineages of this world are based on particular named bloodlines, which date back farther than any other known bloodlines
Ascension works through the naming of these bloodlines, as they are passed down from Father to Son
The reason for this, is that the male line, carries direct lineage, similar to the tap-root on a tree
The male is the seed
The female is the field
The seed of the tree remains the same. It is only the field in which it is planted, which gives variants of the type of tree
The idea, is that the seed, son, looks for new and fertile fields in which to spread the seed, for the next generation of the tree
To this end, the original royal bloodlines did not work in the way they are often historically portrayed
We are told that the Son "Prince", would ideally look for a woman of similar royal status, or from noble bloodlines, in which to sew his seed
An almost incestuous type of inner circle, that would solidify political alliances and power
Originally, this was never the case. Only in recent history with the advent of succession replacing ascension, has this become the case
The true ancient royal bloodlines, would intentionally look for woman outside of known bloodlines. And marriage into other royal bloodlines, was never done
The idea, was for the son to find fresh, new and fertile fields, by taking a wife as far removed from the surrounding genetic pool as possible
This would not only assure healthy and pure offspring, but it would also help to expand the Kingdom geographically. Whilst assuring that the strongest variant of the tree could be created, in the most fertile fields available
The problem for many who aspired to be royalty, was that the only possible way to become so, was to carry the name of the genetic bloodline
This meant, that the only real possible way for your family to go from nobility, to royalty, was to have one of your daughters marry the King, as his field, and create the next generation of offspring
This was less than ideal for those who aspired to power, for a few reasons
Firstly, for the male aspiring, the bloodline was not theirs. Something which is very important to consider, when understanding why it is impossible for Queen Elizabeth II to have been a legitimate heir to the throne
Though your daughter may marry the son of the King, and eventually become Queen herself, when the son takes over the throne, she can only ever be a genetic variant for the seed of another bloodline
Though the children will carry parts of her Fathers genetics, they will not be of his direct bloodline ascendance
The children are bloodline of the King
Sons will be direct bloodline of the King. Not the Father of the Queen
Daughters will be once removed of both King and Queen. Something entirely new. Created for the genetic purposes of keeping the gene pool fresh
Neither are a direct descendant of the Queens Fathers bloodline, thought they carry parts of his genetic make-up
The only true direct descendants, are the male sons, born to the male father
Direct lineage is carried son to son
So, although it is favourable to have your daughter bare the children of the King, it is not ideal
It does not carry your direct bloodline
Even if your daughter becomes the Queen, your "direct" bloodline of sons and their sons, will move farther and farther away from the royal line with each generation
Second problem for nobility? Was that the sons of the King were encouraged to go out and find a woman (often of common birth) in far off lands and kingdoms, to take as his wife, to eventually become Queen
This presented a very big problem for those seeking power, in even having the sons of the King marry one of their daughters
As such was seemed as undesirable to the lineage
Things were done this way for very good and specific reason
It avoided all the problems that are inherent with the adopted processes of succession we see today, and backwards misconceptions and misunderstandings about how "royal" process works
Almost everything that is done today, is backwards, or a complete corruption of what the processes are supposed to be
So what happened to the line of ascension? And how did these problems come about?
It started with the named bloodline of ascension, being abandoned in favour of "House" names
When a bloodline name can only be carried between Father and legitimate son, it made things very difficult for those aspiring to take the throne, to be regarded as legitimate themselves
The only way males could carry the legitimate heir name, was to be born into the family
If they did not carry the name of the direct linage, then it was instantly known, that they were in no way legitimate, or able to sit on the throne
So "House" names were adopted instead
They did away with named bloodlines, so that nobody would be able to tell if you were legitimate by birth or not
They would only know that you were a named member of a particular house. Meaning that it was possible you carried some type of legitimacy by association
This way, any bloodline could take a "name" that was deemed necessary for the throne
And this way, you could make an illegitimate bloodline, the heir to a throne which was not theirs
A throne, that in the old ways, would have been impossible for them to take
As it stands today ... All named "Houses" are illegitimate
Any who belong to a "House" without a named bloodline, did so, in order to illegitimately take a throne
The fact they have no named bloodline, which was done in order to take a throne which was not theirs, is literally the very piece of evidence which proves that the throne is not theirs. And they are illegitimate
The original true heirs to the throne and the named bloodlines still exist to this day
A named bloodline, which is a chain unbroken, since the dawn of man
They are very aware of who these bloodlines are, because of their family name
Kohn, Korn, Kohen and many other variants exist today
Variants of what is known as "Kohen/Christ" in the Bible. Which was known as "Khonsu/Khons" in Egyptian times
A name which means "Conscious"
There is only one variant of this name in particular that carries the true original, unbroken line of ascension though
Yet somehow, we are about to crown a false King in England, who is not of bloodline even close to any of these variants
He is not even of a named bloodline. He belongs to a house
Someone who is claims his succession from his Mothers bloodline. Even though this is impossible, as he carries his Fathers bloodline
A Father who was never named King. Because they understood the implications of this, to the false bloodline who already sat upon the throne
The simple fact, is that you cannot pass a throne down from a Father to a Daughter
It does not matter how people "think" it works. Or how they would like it to work. It simply cannot be done
What happens when you do this, is that the throne becomes the bloodline of the man the Kings daughter marries. Not his
It is no longer the bloodline of the King. It is bloodline of the man his daughter married
So the thone has been handed to a completely different linage
A lineage which is likely less royal, than the already non-royal line that it succeeded from
So to pass the throne from Elizabeth II to Charles, means the throne no longer carries her original lineage. It carries Philips
True lineage can only ever be carried from Father to Son
If the King does not have a son, then the lineage needs regress across generations, until it finds the continued direct descendant
The King has no sons, you go back to the Kings next oldest brother and to his oldest son
Always to the son. Never to the Kings brother
The original ascendance was never carried out laterally
Meaning, that if an heir was needed to a King which had no son, it would never (and could NEVER) be carried to his brother. Only to his brothers sons
This was done to prevent a whole myriad of problems
If the King had no brother, with sons to appoint heirs?
They would look back to the prior generation
They would go back to the Kings Fathers, brother. To the oldest of-age son, or his oldest son (by matching generation)
They would, where necessary, go back as many generations as was needed, to find the truest living male heir, which carried the correct bloodline and name
Line of Ascension cannot be disputed
Line of Succession can
Line of Ascension is legitimate
Line of Succession is not
It is not merely about the named bloodline and family who should be the kings of this world. It is about what the purity of their particular genetics carry
They carry more than just a name and bloodline
They carry abilities and understanding, that are lessened within subsequent genetic lines, the further the branches move away from the trunk of the tree and its roots
These named bloodlines are the rightful heirs because they have the genetically ingrained understanding and abilities to lead this world and connect to it in ways which cannot be faked or imitated
Things which others cannot do. No matter their house, influence, money or resources
But the biggest problem with the line of succession, is that it kills the tree of this world
The further they move into the corrupt lines, and further they continue with the lies and false blood, the darker this world gets
The less we know. The worse the world gets
It is not something which can be faked
They push their own fake house, they limit and kill the true bloodline
To the point where less and less new lines of that bloodline are created
The bloodline regresses backwards, until it is dead completely
And when that happens. This world is dead
It does not matter that they name the "Anti-conscious" (Anti-Christ) by a first name "Charles" which is supposed to mirror the true bloodline (Charles is a "Conscious" variant, similar to "Kohen, Kohn, Korn, Christ, etc) ...
He cannot be, what he is not
He is the literal opposite of the conscious bloodlines that give this world life
If such a thing as the antichrist were to exist in this world? It would be "Prince" Charles, if he is silly enough to take a throne, which he knows does not belong to him
No comments:
Post a Comment