PLANE CRASHES WHILE LANDING

A really vivid dream of a plane crash

I'm standing at the end of the runway watching a plane come in to land

It is flying in so fast that at first I think it is a fighter jet

As it goes over the top, I see it some type of private jet, or small commercial aircraft

It doesn't quite make the runway as it touches down, with its left wheel clipping the dirt edge of the tarmac

This seems to kick the plane over to the left of the runway, where it tries to pull up and abort the landing, but it cannot pull back up properly

It banks off to the left of the runway and I see it clip trees and crash into the bush

I get an extreme close-up view of the plane as it is crashing, like I am watching through a telescope of binoculars

The plane does not explode. The fuselage just gets thrown around and deforms as the wings and other parts are ripped off by the bushland

It eventually pancakes and parts of the roof tear open, exposing passengers being thrown about inside the cabin

It eventually comes to a rest and amazingly, it looks like it was actually possible that all people onboard may have survived

Though this is just an outside perspective. There is significant damage, so it is also just as possible that many people are hurt or killed

I am with other people at the end of the runway. I yell to them that the plane is crashing as I'm watching it and they run to watch it with me

LINE OF ASCENSION vs LINE OF SUCCESSION

This is an amalgamation of things I have learned and been told through various visions, dreams and other such types of encounters, regarding the legitimacy of the throne and how it is seeded and seated

Firstly and most importantly, Queen Elizabeth II was illegitimate

It was impossible for her to be a legitimate Queen, only ever a caretaker to the throne, which belongs to someone else

The simple reason for this, is that he is a female, who did not obtain the throne through marriage

This is where the difference between ascension and succession comes into play

The true "Royal" lineages of this world are based on particular named bloodlines, which date back farther than any other known bloodlines

Ascension works through the naming of these bloodlines, as they are passed down from Father to Son

The reason for this, is that the male line, carries direct lineage, similar to the tap-root on a tree

The male is the seed
The female is the field

The seed of the tree remains the same. It is only the field in which it is planted, which gives variants of the type of tree

The idea, is that the seed, son, looks for new and fertile fields in which to spread the seed, for the next generation of the tree

To this end, the original royal bloodlines did not work in the way they are often historically portrayed

We are told that the Son "Prince", would ideally look for a woman of similar royal status, or from noble bloodlines, in which to sew his seed

An almost incestuous type of inner circle, that would solidify political alliances and power

Originally, this was never the case. Only in recent history with the advent of succession replacing ascension, has this become the case

The true ancient royal bloodlines, would intentionally look for woman outside of known bloodlines. And marriage into other royal bloodlines, was never done

The idea, was for the son to find fresh, new and fertile fields, by taking a wife as far removed from the surrounding genetic pool as possible

This would not only assure healthy and pure offspring, but it would also help to expand the Kingdom geographically. Whilst assuring that the strongest variant of the tree could be created, in the most fertile fields available

The problem for many who aspired to be royalty, was that the only possible way to become so, was to carry the name of the genetic bloodline

This meant, that the only real possible way for your family to go from nobility, to royalty, was to have one of your daughters marry the King, as his field, and create the next generation of offspring

This was less than ideal for those who aspired to power, for a few reasons

Firstly, for the male aspiring, the bloodline was not theirs. Something which is very important to consider, when understanding why it is impossible for Queen Elizabeth II to have been a legitimate heir to the throne

Though your daughter may marry the son of the King, and eventually become Queen herself, when the son takes over the throne, she can only ever be a genetic variant for the seed of another bloodline

Though the children will carry parts of her Fathers genetics, they will not be of his direct bloodline ascendance

The children are bloodline of the King

Sons will be direct bloodline of the King. Not the Father of the Queen
Daughters will be once removed of both King and Queen. Something entirely new. Created for the genetic purposes of keeping the gene pool fresh

Neither are a direct descendant of the Queens Fathers bloodline, thought they carry parts of his genetic make-up

The only true direct descendants, are the male sons, born to the male father

Direct lineage is carried son to son

So, although it is favourable to have your daughter bare the children of the King, it is not ideal

It does not carry your direct bloodline

Even if your daughter becomes the Queen, your "direct" bloodline of sons and their sons, will move farther and farther away from the royal line with each generation

Second problem for nobility? Was that the sons of the King were encouraged to go out and find a woman (often of common birth) in far off lands and kingdoms, to take as his wife, to eventually become Queen

This presented a very big problem for those seeking power, in even having the sons of the King marry one of their daughters

As such was seemed as undesirable to the lineage

Things were done this way for very good and specific reason

It avoided all the problems that are inherent with the adopted processes of succession we see today, and backwards misconceptions and misunderstandings about how "royal" process works

Almost everything that is done today, is backwards, or a complete corruption of what the processes are supposed to be

So what happened to the line of ascension? And how did these problems come about?

It started with the named bloodline of ascension, being abandoned in favour of "House" names

When a bloodline name can only be carried between Father and legitimate son, it made things very difficult for those aspiring to take the throne, to be regarded as legitimate themselves

The only way males could carry the legitimate heir name, was to be born into the family

If they did not carry the name of the direct linage, then it was instantly known, that they were in no way legitimate, or able to sit on the throne

So "House" names were adopted instead

They did away with named bloodlines, so that nobody would be able to tell if you were legitimate by birth or not

They would only know that you were a named member of a particular house. Meaning that it was possible you carried some type of legitimacy by association

This way, any bloodline could take a "name" that was deemed necessary for the throne

And this way, you could make an illegitimate bloodline, the heir to a throne which was not theirs

A throne, that in the old ways, would have been impossible for them to take

As it stands today ... All named "Houses" are illegitimate

Any who belong to a "House" without a named bloodline, did so, in order to illegitimately take a throne

The fact they have no named bloodline, which was done in order to take a throne which was not theirs, is literally the very piece of evidence which proves that the throne is not theirs. And they are illegitimate

The original true heirs to the throne and the named bloodlines still exist to this day

A named bloodline, which is a chain unbroken, since the dawn of man

They are very aware of who these bloodlines are, because of their family name

Kohn, Korn, Kohen and many other variants exist today

Variants of what is known as "Kohen/Christ" in the Bible. Which was known as "Khonsu/Khons" in Egyptian times

A name which means "Conscious"

There is only one variant of this name in particular that carries the true original, unbroken line of ascension though

Yet somehow, we are about to crown a false King in England, who is not of bloodline even close to any of these variants

He is not even of a named bloodline. He belongs to a house

Someone who is claims his succession from his Mothers bloodline. Even though this is impossible, as he carries his Fathers bloodline

A Father who was never named King. Because they understood the implications of this, to the false bloodline who already sat upon the throne

The simple fact, is that you cannot pass a throne down from a Father to a Daughter

It does not matter how people "think" it works. Or how they would like it to work. It simply cannot be done

What happens when you do this, is that the throne becomes the bloodline of the man the Kings daughter marries. Not his

It is no longer the bloodline of the King. It is bloodline of the man his daughter married

So the thone has been handed to a completely different linage

A lineage which is likely less royal, than the already non-royal line that it succeeded from

So to pass the throne from Elizabeth II to Charles, means the throne no longer carries her original lineage. It carries Philips

True lineage can only ever be carried from Father to Son

If the King does not have a son, then the lineage needs regress across generations, until it finds the continued direct descendant

The King has no sons, you go back to the Kings next oldest brother and to his oldest son

Always to the son. Never to the Kings brother

The original ascendance was never carried out laterally

Meaning, that if an heir was needed to a King which had no son, it would never (and could NEVER) be carried to his brother. Only to his brothers sons

This was done to prevent a whole myriad of problems

If the King had no brother, with sons to appoint heirs?

They would look back to the prior generation

They would go back to the Kings Fathers, brother. To the oldest of-age son, or his oldest son (by matching generation)

They would, where necessary, go back as many generations as was needed, to find the truest living male heir, which carried the correct bloodline and name

Line of Ascension cannot be disputed

Line  of Succession can

Line of Ascension is legitimate

Line of Succession is not

It is not merely about the named bloodline and family who should be the kings of this world. It is about what the purity of their particular genetics carry

They carry more than just a name and bloodline

They carry abilities and understanding, that are lessened within subsequent genetic lines, the further the branches move away from the trunk of the tree and its roots

These named bloodlines are the rightful heirs because they have the genetically ingrained understanding and abilities to lead this world and connect to it in ways which cannot be faked or imitated

Things which others cannot do. No matter their house, influence, money or resources

But the biggest problem with the line of succession, is that it kills the tree of this world

The further they move into the corrupt lines, and further they continue with the lies and false blood, the darker this world gets

The less we know. The worse the world gets

It is not something which can be faked

They push their own fake house, they limit and kill the true bloodline

To the point where less and less new lines of that bloodline are created

The bloodline regresses backwards, until it is dead completely

And when that happens. This world is dead

It does not matter that they name the "Anti-conscious" (Anti-Christ) by a first name "Charles" which is supposed to mirror the true bloodline (Charles is a "Conscious" variant, similar to "Kohen, Kohn, Korn, Christ, etc) ...

He cannot be, what he is not

He is the literal opposite of the conscious bloodlines that give this world life

If such a thing as the antichrist were to exist in this world? It would be "Prince" Charles, if he is silly enough to take a throne, which he knows does not belong to him

FLOODS AND A VERY GREEK "PRINCE" CHARLES

I am talking to an older Greek man. A man who I believe is supposed to be Prince Charles. I wondered why he looked very inherently Greek compared to Prince Charles, till I realise that Charles father was supposed to be Greek

We are talking about massive floods which hit Darwin

I ask him if he were affected at his house. "House?" he said, making a point of emphasising very specific meaning in my choice of words

He confirms that yes, the flood affected him "over in Alawa"

I tell him that the flood was so big, that in places, you would have been able to ride the surge like waves with a surfboard

If it were not far too dangerous to do so

Then we are sitting on a shaded ridge line, overlooking massive stone buildings. Buildings arranged in such a way that you we are looking between two massive buildings facing each other, over the top of some smaller building, at a massive centre-piece type building in the background, facing us, tying the others on either side together

The buildings are so massive, that there is football fields inbetween them, with people scurrying across the grass between buildings, like little ants

The building in the background is on a scale similar to the Taj Mahal. Probably bigger, because it is longer across the breadth

The middle of the centre-piece building, is a massive tower. Like a clock tower, holding the middle spire up above the rest of the buildings in scope and scale

The fields and surrounding gardens are beautifully tended to

To be sitting on the ridge line looking at this is awe inspiring

The buildings in size, easily dwarf the layout and buildings of similar structure in Washington

And the stonework, is the type that has not been seen in this world for a very long time. There is literally nothing like it in the world, being build of solid stone, in the world today. There has not been anything like this, probably in recent history. Anywhere

Charles finally notices what we are looking at, and verbally "Wow" in wonder at what he is seeing

In this moment. I realise a connection between him and myself within the real waking world

His is a real conscious entity, somewhere in this world. The same as I

And somehow, we are sharing this view here. Now

I am, for a moment, shocked, that a real living person in this world, is sharing one of these vivid, real life, colour visions, which I have often

It is normally only myself having these types of visions

But for this one. For some reason. He is present

I feel a momentary sense of something that almost feels like pride. A feeling almost like happiness, at someone experiencing something in your world and finding it beautiful

I go to step down off the ledge of the ridge to the ground. It looks like it is only a short drop, but it is actually a massive way down. A fall you would not survive

I warn Charles. Telling him that it looks small, but it is actually much, much bigger than he thinks

Something I think was done intentionally, to emphasise the scope of the stone buildings and surrounding grounds that we are looking at

They may look small, but they are massive on a global scale. Dwarfing most old stone buildings of a similar size, across the entire planet

There is an entity present, acting as a guide, as there often is when I have vivid waking dreams and visions such as this

Someone who puts things into context, or often, details things very blatantly

"What you are looking at, will be built in Darwin, in around 60 years from now. Outside of Palmerston"

I try to guess what it is. Thinking that it is likely one of the premium centres for learning in the world

Guessing that it is a University, I call it "A.I.N"

I wake up, trying to guess what this means

Possibly, it meant something to "Prince" Charles, if indeed it were him, sharing the vision