I am being taught subconsciously
Something is explaining the concept of "original sin" to me, as being the "family name" or "surname"
They then detailed it's link to the Bible, Church, and specifically the Anglican Church. And how it makes those without a Surname lineage, such as those belonging to "houses" illegitimate
They illustrated how the current caretaker monarchy, the house of Windsor, is incompatible with the Bible, Church and God that they claim affinity and legitimacy from, without a family named lineage
The surname is something that does not change and is impossible to legitimise, without being the direct and true descendant of that bloodline
That's why they started using "houses". So they could make illegitimate, unrightful and/or unworthy people royalty. When they aren't and never could be true royalty
It actually made me think of them as possibly not being real. Like they are fictional characters in a story, or NPC's in a computer game
Like in the new Star Wars movie where Rey took the name "Skywalker" at the end of the movie. It made me instantly cringe, because you can't just take a name. It doesn't work like that
It's exactly like Elizabeth II having plans to hand over to Charles
Charles is descendant of his Father's bloodline, not Elizabeth II bloodline
This is why you can't hand the throne from a male to a female. It doesn't work like that. If you do, it ceases to be the same bloodline, it's a completely different bloodline
You can't fake it. You are either it, or you are not
No comments:
Post a Comment